Missouri Accident Lawyer Blog

Arguments on a case that could have big ramifications for medical malpractice laws in the state of Missouri were heard today by the Missouri Supreme Court. At the heart of the issue is the question of whether the state's $350,000 non-economic damage cap is fair to consumers and whether the cap can be applied retroactively to injuries sustained before a limit was in place.

As we reported earlier, the case was initially filed by James and Mary Klotz of Arnold, Missouri. James Klotz won a medical malpractice lawsuit after massive complications arose from an operation to insert a pacemaker. While the jury awarded Klotz $1 million, the non-economic damages were reduced to just $350,000. While the actual lawsuit was filed after the 2005 cap was put in place, the personal injuries were sustained in an operation that occurred in 2004.

Those opposed to the damage caps, including consumer advocates and Missouri medical malpractice lawyers, say that the caps are unfair and unconstitutional. They could also be seen as restricting access to the court system, especially for people earning lower to moderate incomes. If non-economic damage awards are reduced arbitrarily to $350,000, it makes it financially unfeasible to take a case to court, a process which could cost tens of thousands of dollars in itself.

It also seems particularly unfair to limit the award given to the James Klotz since his injuries were sustained prior to the cap being in place. According to the St. Louis Post Dispatch, the argument was made before the Supreme Court that limiting the Klotz award was similar to placing a limit on damages for accident victims the day after a bridge collapse. The defense argued that lawsuits arising from that hypthetical situation were different than the actual medical malpractice case before the court.

We will be sure to follow up on this story as it develops.